Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:13
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Poll: Are You Happy with Your PS Plus Essential Games for June 2025? - Push Square
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russell takes win in Canada as Piastri and Norris collide - Formula 1
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What drivers said at Michigan after Cup race won by Denny Hamlin - NBC Sports
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Do older women know what they want?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Jonas Brothers cancel and move upcoming concerts, including one in North Texas - WFAA
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Do the British people realize how much American people absolutely despise them?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: